Select a language
For decades, the Social Europe project felt less like a destination and more like a mirage. A series of initiatives often sidelined by market competition and fiscal constraints. However, a new dawn may be breaking. With the transposition of the European Directive on Adequate Minimum Wages (2022/2041), the European Union may be attempting one of its most ambitious attempts to reduce in-work poverty and wage inequality.
As the European Trade Union Institute (ETUI) suggests in its recent report, Here Comes the Sun by Torsten Müller, Senior Researcher, this Directive is not merely a technical adjustment. It is a potential game-changer that could shift the power dynamics of the European labour market. But as the November 2024 deadline for transposition has passed, a crucial question remains: is the sun truly rising, or is it being obscured by national inertia?
A paradigm shift in EU law
The Directive opens a new chapter, as it is the first piece of EU legislation explicitly designed to ensure wage adequacy and facilitate workers' access to minimum wage. By establishing a framework based on adequacy criteria, such as the purchasing power of wages and the 60/50 rule (60% of the median wage or 50% of the average wage), the EU is transitioning from a low-cost competitiveness logic toward one of social convergence.
This shift is already reflected in the data. In their January 2026 analysis, Eurofound researchers Christine Aumayr-Pintar, Carlos Vacas-Soriano and Felix Appler note that the Directive has become a major driver of wage growth. They explain that many Member States have moved toward "more structural uprates" by adhering to the "indicative reference values" (such as the 60% median wage) set out in the Directive. According to them, "2026 looks likely to be a good year for many workers on the minimum wage, as they'll see their purchasing power grow," with these actual paycheck increases now "significantly exceeding price increases" across most of the EU.
On top of that, as Torsten Müller anticipated during a conference in Luxembourg University in 2024, another structural shift is in view: “The Directive will have a great impact on collective bargaining as it sets the explicit objective of strengthening collective bargaining, and it defines an 80% threshold, where countries have to make an action plan”. Therefore, each EU Member State must ensure that its national minimum wage is at least 80% of the median wage, or 60% of the average gross wage, in that country. Research by ETUI, particularly in their Road to 80% policy brief (2025), explains that only eight EU member states can pride themselves on having reached such a threshold. The other 19 will have to take action as they deem appropriate and, most of all, do that in consultation with trade unions and employers. Indeed, “We can only achieve 80% through sectoral bargaining, the directive is an explicit call to strengthen it”, notes Müller.
These shifts are deeply rooted in the European Pillar of Social Rights, adopted by the EU in 2017 and initially seen as a collection of non-binding principles. The Directive represents its transition from "soft law" into "hard law", by giving substance to Principle 6 which asserts the right to wages providing for a decent standard of living. A testament to the fact that the EU could be finally aligning its economic governance with its social promises, and trying to make the Social Pillar the compass for its post-pandemic recovery.
The impact is already visible. Even before formal transposition was completed, the shadow of the Directive prompted significant raises. In Bulgaria, a country often categorised as a "laggard" due to political instability, an automatic formula was introduced leading to a rapid increase of minimum wage by nearly 20% in 2024. As the ETUI report notes, the Directive has acted as a legal shield validating the EU’s competence to intervene in social matters, a point recently upheld by the EU Court of Justice against challenges from Denmark and Sweden.
Frontrunners vs. minimalists
The landscape of transposition across the 27 Member States reveals a fragmented landscape. ETUI identifies nine frontrunners (e.g. Croatia, Slovenia, and Romania) that have embraced the Directive to overhaul their systems. Romania, for instance, has set its minimum wage between 47% and 52% of the average wage through Law 283/2024 and increased powers for the Labour Inspectorate to ensure these gains aren't just on paper.
Yet the Romanian case also illustrates the limits of formal compliance. Trade unions warn that recent government decisions risk undermining this progress. In a December 2025 statement, the National Trade Union Bloc (BNS) criticised the postponement of the next uprate from 1st January to 1st July 2026, arguing that it “violates the agreed mechanism for setting the minimum wage” and fails to respect “the adequacy criteria required by the EU Directive”. For BNS, delaying the increase means workers will continue to lose purchasing power despite the reforms introduced in recent years.
On the other end of the spectrum are the minimalists. Countries like Germany and Ireland have declared their existing systems compliant without introducing significant legislative changes. In Berlin, the Minimum Wage Commission has begun considering the 60% median wage benchmark, leading to pioneering recommendations for 2026, although some argue that the lack of structural reform misses the Directive's broader spirit.
This lack of ambition reflects a shifting political weather in Brussels. Speaking to Voxeurop in February 2026, ETUI’s Torsten Müller noted that the "competitiveness narrative" has gained significant ground within the European Commission and the European Council, often at the expense of the social dimension. We are already seeing a concrete impact at the national level: several governments are now postponing their deadlines to reach adequacy thresholds, citing competitiveness as the primary hurdle.
Yet, Müller warns against a false choice between social rights and economic strength. "All those who strive for a social Europe must be very vigilant to ensure that the social dimension is not subordinated to the pursuit of competitiveness, but rather that it is seen as an integral part of Europe's competitiveness," he argues. This warning comes at a pivotal moment, as the debate sparked by the 2024 Draghi Report on EU competitiveness, focusing on massive investment and industrial agility to compete with the US and China, continues to dominate the Brussels agenda.
The path to convergence has not been without resistance. Fearful that EU intervention would undermine its successful "Nordic model", where wages are set exclusively by social partners without state interference, Denmark challenged the Directive’s legality. Although the European Court of Justice overall largely upheld the Directive in 2025, it struck down some provisions – including those requiring binding criteria for setting minimum wages – to protect national systems such as the Nordic model. This case highlights the delicate balance between European social integration and the preservation of well-functioning national labour traditions.
The real battleground: the road to 80%
While statutory minimum dominates the public discourse, the Directive’s true revolutionary potential lies in Article 4: the promotion of collective bargaining. The 80% threshold is the key mechanism of the Directive. For the 19 Member States currently below this mark, the law mandates the creation of a national action plan to be developed in consultation with social partners, with concrete measures and a clear timeline to promote sectoral bargaining.
By the end of 2025, ten such plans had reached the Commission, but the results are what Müller describes as a "mixed bag." While some countries, like Estonia and Latvia, have produced mere "declarations of intent" that lack concrete measures, others are using the Directive to address long-standing issues.
The standout success is Greece, where the action plan marks a complete reversal of the austerity measures that dismantled collective bargaining fifteen years ago. According to Müller, the Greek plan is truly transformative, aiming to rebuild an entire sectoral bargaining system. However, for the Directive to succeed elsewhere, the European Commission’s role as a watchdog is crucial. "The key aspect is whether the Commission tightly monitors and scrutinizes the action plans, if need be by starting infringement procedures if the plans are deemed inadequate", Müller explains.
Greek trade unions have also begun to use the Directive as a benchmark to assess national reforms. In 2025, the Greek Confederation of Labour (GSEE) criticised the government for not aligning the minimum wage with the adequacy criteria set out in the EU Directive.
This shift toward sectoral bargaining is crucial. In countries like Romania, where coverage plummeted to 20% in 2016, recent reforms have already pushed it back up to 43% by lowering representativeness thresholds. However, in minimalist countries like Germany (where coverage sits at 49%), the absence of new legislative measures to bolster unions remains a striking gap.
Challenges ahead
Despite reasons to be optimistic, the sun is not without clouds. Eight Member States missed the November 2024 deadline for transposition entirely, often citing political volatility. In Estonia and Ireland, governments have postponed plans to align minimum wages with the Directive’s reference values, fearing an economic backlash.
The situation in Italy highlights the complexity of this transition even more. On paper, the country has a collective bargaining coverage well beyond the 80% mark, yet it suffers from poor wage dynamics. and the phenomenon of "pirate contracts", i.e. agreements signed by minor, less representative unions to undercut wages. Here, the Directive’s focus on adequacy rather than just coverage is essential, as it challenges the Italian paradox where a worker can be covered by a contract but still live in poverty.
The role of the European Commission is now critical. As the ETUI argues, to make the Directive really effective we need a European Action Plan that integrates collective bargaining into the European Semester, the annual socio-economic coordination process. This would ensure that public funds and contracts only go to companies that respect the right to organise and negotiate.
The Directive on Adequate Minimum Wages is about redefining the European Social Model for the 21st century. For the first time we have a legal framework empowering trade unions and civil society to demand more than just survival. But we are only halfway there. If the EU holds member states accountable and if national unions use the Directive as a lever for sectoral bargaining, the turning point will become a reality. The sun is indeed dawning, but Europe’s workers must ensure they have a seat at the table to feel its warmth.
Do you like our work?
Help multilingual European journalism to thrive, without ads or paywalls. Your one-off or regular support will keep our newsroom independent. Thank you!
