Interview Green investment Subscribers

Adrienne Buller: Don’t be fooled by the promises of green capitalism

What are the limits of a net-zero strategy that entrusts everything to the free market and leaves structures of power and injustice untouched? And how should we see the role of green investment? A conversation on what's at stake with Adrienne Buller of the think tank Common Wealth.

Published on 10 September 2024
This article is reserved for our subscribers

As climate denialism wanes, the green transition now faces a new threat: the false solutions of so-called "green capitalism". Devices such as carbon markets and offsets are showing the limits of any strategy that refuses to tackle existing power structures and inequalities.

Adrienne Buller

By itself, the invisible hand of the market will never be enough to cool our overheating planet. This thesis is laid out by Adrienne Buller, a researcher at the progressive British think tank Common Wealth.

Since 2019, she has been studying ownership models that might allow for a more democratic and sustainable economy. Buller is author of The Value of a Whale (Add publisher, 2024) and co-author with Mathew Lawrence of Owning the Future (Verso, 2022).

What does it mean to put a price on a whale?

A 2019 study by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) tried to establish the economic value of a whale, and came up with a figure of around two million dollars. The study was well-intentioned: expressing a whale's value would encourage its conservation. But the anecdote illustrates a problem with the way capitalism sees the climate crisis. Everything must be mediated through the market and something can only have value if it has a price. Even the life of a whale.

What does "green capitalism" mean? What are its aims?

On an ideological level, it is based on the view that we can tackle the climate crisis by transforming and decarbonising the global economy without having to address any of the social relationships and inequalities that define capitalism. I suppose its underlying aim is this: to maintain existing systems as much as possible while transforming large swathes of the economy. More concretely, it is a response to the climate crisis based almost exclusively on market mechanisms, be they carbon prices or corporate-responsibility policies (the ESG criteria) rather than on public investments and interventions. In simple terms: if we can set the right price, the market will do the rest.

Over the last ten years, hedge funds (such as BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street) have accrued more and more power. How does their growth influence climate action, or inaction?

Are you a news organisation, a business, an association or a foundation? Check out our bespoke editorial and translation services.

Support border-free European journalism

See our subscription offers, or donate to bolster our independence

On the same topic