I want to see Van Rompuy. Border crossing at Portile-de-Fier, between Serbia and Romania (AFP)

EU opens the gates another crack

After years of gridlock, the EU 27 have now decided to get the Serbian accession talks going again. Whilst delighted by the EU’s green light for Serbia’s free trade agreement, the Serb press says Belgrade still has a long way to go before it can hope for accession.

Published on 10 December 2009 at 17:03
I want to see Van Rompuy. Border crossing at Portile-de-Fier, between Serbia and Romania (AFP)

On 7 December, the European Union decided to implement a free trade agreement with Serbia, which the Netherlands had put on ice for a year and a half. This thaw is a step towards application of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement (SAA) signed in 2008, which is, in turn, a prelude to accession. Politika admonishes, however, that Serbia still has a long way to go before the SAA can really be put into operation. The main condition, the daily reminds us, is “full cooperation with the International Criminal Tribunal for ex-Yugoslavia (ICTY) and with the efforts to arrest General Mladic”, the ex-Bosnian Serb military chief accused of genocide.

“Serbia also needs to resolve the problem of Kosovo’s final status,” explains Politika. “What is its final status? Clearly, the one that would be acceptable to Serbia. And that could take years, even decades. But it is hardly likely Serbia can join the EU without resolving that problem.” The Bosnia-Herzegovina situation will loom large in the negotiations as well. “Milorad Dodik, prime minister of the Serb entity in Bosnia, has been pursuing a policy of non-cooperation with the central institutions in Sarajevo, which raises the question of Belgrade’s leverage with him,” notes Politika. “But the real problem is the inherent instability of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the dearth of new ideas from the international community” on how to deal with that.

EU divided on how to proceed

The paper doubts any new ideas are forthcoming from Brussels. After all, it adds sarcastically, “the new EU president’s charismatic personality” and the “new foreign representative’s wealth of diplomatic experience” go to show that those who appointed them are not keen on changing much with regard to enlargement. “The EU’s big countries are weary of enlargement and, for the time being, not showing any signs that might be just a passing weariness.” Still, insists Danas, Serbia has made some significant headway. “Its parliament is becoming more and more effective, the justice system reform is no longer a dead letter, the nation’s institutions are gaining in independence, and a political consensus is shaping on the need for EU accession.”

Receive the best of European journalism straight to your inbox every Thursday

That being said, the 27 are divided over how to proceed. “The Netherlands, Germany, and perhaps France and Great Britain feel Serbia should not apply to the EU till the Council of Ministers has ratified the Stabilisation and Association Agreement, and at all events not before June 2010,” reports the Serb daily. “Unless Ratko Mladic is arrested in the interval. On the other hand, Italy, Spain and Greece see no reason to wait and feel Belgrade ought to be on the same train as Montenegro and Albania, whose bids have arrived in Brussels.” In this context, opines Politika, “Serbia would be well advised to concentrate on economic integration so as to make its economy more competitive, attract investors and promote growth.” So the free trade agreement could be Serbia’s big break. “The Serbian people are bound to be the chief beneficiaries,” foresees the daily Blic, emphasising the progressive dismantling of tariff walls. “The first sectors to feel the effects of the lower prices will be the food, textile, timber and furniture industries. The free trade agreement will also bring competition between Serb businesses into play, bringing prices down too. Furthermore, it opens the door to foreign investors and favours exports.”

Neighbours

Belgrade and Sofia at daggers

The Serb authorities did not take kindly to the stance Bulgaria has taken in the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague, which is to adjudicate the “legality” of Kosovo’s declaration of independence (of 17 February 2008). “International law does not bar any such declaration of independence,” Sofia submits. This move carries on the “Bulgarian tradition of stabbing the Serbs in the back at difficult junctures,” remarks the Bulgarian daily Sega. “Sofia and Belgrade have been at daggers with each other throughout the past two centuries” – i.e. in both world wars and in the Balkan conflict between the two. Can this dispute be resolved inside the European Union? Sega says Belgrade makes no bones about its ambition to be a “regional leader of sorts” – an ambition undermined by Bulgaria’s accession in early 2007.

Tags

Was this article useful? If so we are delighted!

It is freely available because we believe that the right to free and independent information is essential for democracy. But this right is not guaranteed forever, and independence comes at a cost. We need your support in order to continue publishing independent, multilingual news for all Europeans.

Discover our subscription offers and their exclusive benefits and become a member of our community now!

Are you a news organisation, a business, an association or a foundation? Check out our bespoke editorial and translation services.

Support independent European journalism

European democracy needs independent media. Join our community!

On the same topic