Calls to boycott Syrian oil

Published on 31 August 2011 at 12:29

Should Shell boycott Syrian oil in the wake of the Bashar al-Assad regime’s violent repression of the popular uprising? Trouw argues that it should, but “first we need an international decision.” The question has been raised by a number of political parties, which want the Anglo-Dutch oil company to assume its responsibilities and withdraw from the country as soon as possible. According to the Amsterdam daily, “oil companies should not be instrumentalised by political initiatives” and “unilateral action by Shell could be counterproductive,” because if Shell is obliged to leave the country, it will simply be replaced by one of its rivals.

The question of a boycott will also be on the agenda for the meeting of EU foreign ministers to take place in Poland on the 2nd and 3rd September. Having reminded its readers that the United States already adopted this measure in early August, Volkskrant argues that “the EU should stop dithering and follow the example set by the Americans.” However, doubts persist about the potential impact of an international initiative. Trouw notes that “although 95% of Syrian oil is exported to Europe, it is not certain that the Assad regime will be effectively undermined by a boycott.”

Tags

Was this article useful? If so we are delighted!

It is freely available because we believe that the right to free and independent information is essential for democracy. But this right is not guaranteed forever, and independence comes at a cost. We need your support in order to continue publishing independent, multilingual news for all Europeans.

Discover our subscription offers and their exclusive benefits and become a member of our community now!

Are you a news organisation, a business, an association or a foundation? Check out our bespoke editorial and translation services.

Support independent European journalism

European democracy needs independent media. Join our community!

On the same topic